Veni Markovski Writes About Life | Мисли на Вени Марковски за живота
Today’s New York Times published a good article about night life in Bulgaria.
It starts with a description of a well-known place for all Bulgarian students – the Studentski grad (Google’s Maps), or Student’s Town – a place, where majority of the students studying in Sofia live. It has been turning into one of the fastest growing areas in Sofia.
The article continues:
At night, many of the area’s 25,000 students — including engineering and economics majors at the Technical University and the University of National and World Economy — hoof it to more than 30 strobe-lighted bars and discos, many hidden behind aged, Soviet-era dorms and publicized only by word of mouth. Spurred by Bulgaria’s accession into the European Union this year, the capital city of Sofia is experiencing a night-life boom. And nowhere is this more apparent that in Studentski Grad, where cheap rents, lax zoning rules and young residents mean that clubs and bars are opening everywhere, from vacant lots to active dormitories.
Read the whole story, including opinions of the mayor of the Student’s Town, visitors, and impressions from the city at the NYT web page.
ВНИМАНИЕ:
(1 юли, 02:07 часа: има нови връзки в края на статията!
Известно е, че в България, а и по света (да не помислите, че сме уникални) има винаги недоволни от решенията на съда. В случая недоволните са протестирали преди малко в София, а пък решението е на Върховния административен съд и прогласява “НИЩОЖНОСТТА на Заповед №РД-30/24.01.1995 г. на Министъра на околната среда, с която на основание чл. 17 и чл. 22 от Закона за защита на природата (отм.) е обявен Народен парк „Странджа” на площ от 116136,2 ха.”
С други думи – няма вече Народен парк “Странжда”. Има възможност за ново строителство – масово, като това на морето. Решението е подписано с особено мнение на един от съдиите.
Делото е по жалба на кмета на община Царево Петко Арнаудов.
Вижте по-долу цялото решение.
Read more…
The Free Software Foundation released version 3 of the GNU General Public License (GNU GPL), the world’s most popular free software license.
“Since we founded the free software movement, over 23 years ago, the free software community has developed thousands of useful programs that respect the user’s freedom. The programs are in the GNU/Linux operating system, as well as personal computers, telephones, Internet servers, and more. Most of these programs use the GNU GPL to guarantee every user the freedom to run, study, adapt, improve, and redistribute the program,” said Richard Stallman, founder and president of the FSF.
Version 3 of the GNU GPL strengthens this guarantee, by ensuring that users can modify the free software on their personal and household devices, and granting patent licenses to every user. It also extends compatibility with other free software licenses and increases international uniformity.
Read Richard’s essay on the topic.
“Фокус” съобщава за протест срещу възможността българска фирма – “Енергоремонт” да купи охридксата фирма “Емо”. За самата покупко-продажба писа и Инвестор.бг.
Интересната новина е, че македонските работници протестирали с лозунги от типа “Защо да ни купуват българите?”
Фокус напомня, че протести срещу български инвестиции в Македония е имало и по-рано и – забележете:
Продажбата на захарната фабрика в Битоля също бе съпроводена с протести, стачки, камъни и тояги и със същите лозунги „Защо да ни купуват българите?”. Купувач на „Шекераната” стана фирма, регистрирана в Лихтенщайн, свързвана с „Мултигруп”. След протести и бдения сделката не бе финализирана /2001 г./ и по-късно захарната фабрика фалира. По-късно фалиралата фабрика бе купена отново от българска фирма.
Фактът на протеста само показва, че в Македония не всичко е така, както би трябвало да бъде в една нормална и демократична страна. Пожелавам успех на управниците в образованието на сънародниците ни.
I blogged on Nov. 22nd, 2006, about an interview I had with the FTC Internet Task Force some time ago.
Well, today the Federal Trade Commission’s Internet Access Task Force issued a report, “Broadband Connectivity Competition Policy (PDF),” which summarizes the Task Force’s findings in the area of broadband Internet connectivity and, in particular, so-called network neutrality regulation. Based on these findings, and FTC staff’s experience with the operation of myriad markets throughout the economy, the report identifies guiding principles that policy makers should consider in evaluating proposed regulations or legislation relating to broadband Internet access and network neutrality.
According to Chairman Deborah Platt Majoras, “This report recommends that policy makers proceed with caution in the evolving, dynamic industry of broadband Internet access, which generally is moving toward more – not less – competition. In the absence of significant market failure or demonstrated consumer harm, policy makers should be particularly hesitant to enact new regulation in this area.”
As the report notes, certain conduct and business arrangements that broadband providers may pursue, including data prioritization, exclusive deals, and vertical integration into online content and applications, can benefit consumers. “The primary reason for caution is simply that we do not know what the net effects of potential conduct by broadband providers will be on all consumers, including, among other things, the prices that consumers may pay for Internet access, the quality of Internet access and other services that will be offered, and the choices of content and applications that may be available to consumers in the marketplace.”
Noting that three federal agencies – the Federal Communications Commission, the Department of Justice, and the FTC – have jurisdiction to address broadband Internet access, the report explains that the FTC, for its part, will continue to devote substantial resources to maintaining competition and protecting consumers in the broadband area. In addition to vigorously enforcing the antitrust and consumer protection laws, the FTC will expend considerable efforts on consumer education, industry guidance, and competition advocacy in the area of broadband Internet access.
In addition to proposing guiding principles for policy makers, the report includes background information on the technical functioning of the Internet and the legal and regulatory developments that have led to the current debate over network neutrality regulation; provides an overview of the arguments for and against such regulation; analyzes the consumer welfare effects of certain potential conduct by broadband providers, including data discrimination and prioritization; explores the application of the antitrust and consumer protection laws to such conduct; and identifies various proposals for broadband Internet access that have been put forth to date.
The report is the second publicly released work from the Task Force, which was convened by Chairman Majoras in August 2006 and is headed by Maureen K. Ohlhausen, Director of the FTC’s Office of Policy Planning. With members from throughout the agency, the Task Force seeks to enhance the FTC’s expertise in the increasingly important area of Internet access.
The Commission vote to approve the report was 5-0, with Commissioner Jon Leibowitz issuing a separate concurring statement. In his statement, Commissioner Leibowitz said, “The Report also soberly reminds us that regulation often has unintended side-effects. That is surely true. But it seems to me equally clear that this Report shows that doing nothing may have its costs as well.”
CNN reported that the mayor of San Francisco has issued an executive order banning city departments to buy bottled water. It turned out they use about 1 billion bottles per year, and because of “the environmental impact of making, transporting and disposing of the bottles”.
Congratulations, Mayor Newscom! Let’s hope the other mayors will follow.
A blog site makes this popular – Chinese made food, health products (e.g. toothpaste), and toys for kids, are dangerous for human life and health. Read the rest of the story at the original address.
My question is how do we solve the moral dilema – from one perspective it makes sense not to buy anymore China-made products. From another, kids’ perspective, though, almost ALL toys are made in China. So?
Интересна публикация в Portal.bg, от която се разбира за поредната черна точка за “Майкрософт” – този път в опитите му да “прецака” Google.
Yovko informed me that a good friend of mine, and of Bulgaria, has decided to move on and switch from fighting big copyright corporations to fighting corruption.
Prof. Lawrance (Larry) Lessig has announced this during the iCommons iSummit in Dubrovnik (where we’ve sent couple of people from the Bulgarian Creative Commons team).
Here’s what Larry had to say:
Read more…
[powered by WordPress.]

18 queries. 2.097 seconds